Efficiency of the cal-slt electron finder

Last update: 8 dec 1997

L.W. Wiggers


In this study I used a dst tape and selected  the different tlt electron finders. Then I looked whether I could find a cal-slt electron (see algorithm) in the same theta-range. The other  way around, I also looked when selecting the cal-slt electron, whether there was a tlt electron:

cuts:

Results per event (the 4 tlt electron finders are: Elec, Local, Sinistra and Emille).
condition cal-slt* cal_slt tlt1 tlt2 tlt3 tlt4 flt iso-e golden nc exo nc 4
cal-slt electron - 4679 1939 2808 2779 1418 4289 1068 1256
tlt1-electron 1938 1939 1943 1859 1909 1350 1942 693 695
tlt2-electron 2722 2808 1859 3000 2416 1357 2882 904 1045
tlt3-electron 2735 2779 1909 2416 2814 1387 2789 961 1042
tlt4-electron 1417 1418 1350 1357 1387 1421 1418 487 497
tlt4-electron (prob>0.5) - 1696 1572 1619 1660 1700 1697 612 629
flt iso-e  - 4289 1942 2882 2789 1418 5511 1156 1264
golden nc bit  - 1068 693 904 961 487 1156 1175 632
exo nc 4 bit  - 1256 695 1045 1042 497 1264 632 1330

To find out what the rates are in the input sample for the SLT, passthrough events were selected from the same run:

Results for 17786 passthrough events of the same run.
condition cal-slt tlt1 tlt2 tlt3 tlt4 flt iso-e golden nc exo nc 4
cal-slt electron 1436 76 209 122 47 1233 29 43
tlt1-electron 76 76 71 73 44 76 22 26
tlt2-electron 209 71 254 108 45 226 24 36
tlt3-electron 122 73 108 127 46 126 26 37
tlt4-electron 47 44 45 46 47 47 13 15
flt iso-e 1233 76 226 126 47 2651 31 46
golden nc bit 29 22 24 26 13 31 32 21
exo nc 4 bit  43 26 36 37 15 46 21 48


Plots for the DST events:

Cal-Slt electron energy vs. TLT Emille electron energy (tltelec(4)). The cal-slt electron had to be within 0.1 rad from the tlt electron. If no cal-slt electron was found, the cal-slt electron energy was set to 1 GeV.

Cal-Slt electron energy vs. TLT SINISTRA electron energy (tlt3):

Moreover, Cal-Slt electron energy vs. TLT ELEC (tlt1) and LOCAL  (tlt2) electron energy.